Foreclosures Challenging Congress
Foreclosures are challenging Congress and as yet seem to be enjoying the last laugh. Democrat Rep. Tim Walz speaks about his own personal experience. The house next to his has been in foreclosure for more than a year and pulled down the value of his own unit by 20%. The story of Walz is being repeated all over Minnesota with the bursting of the housing bubble. Both Democrats and Republicans are harangued with complaints from community leaders about the rot spreading from foreclosed vacant houses. Leaders of both parties are huddled together sitting at the same table desperate to find solutions to tackle the common enemy.
The House and Senate have passed bills and more are in the offing. There are doubts if the Democratic led Congress will be able to come to terms with Bush administration and the President’s veto threat.
The House bill consists of three parts aimed at avoiding foreclosures with the hope of bringing back the mortgage market to its rails. It allotted greater powers to the Federal Housing Agency to be able to insure refinanced mortgages. On their part the lenders would have to reduce the amount of loan in tune with the prevailing market prices. Secondly the bill allows $11 billion as tax credits to buyers and mortgage holders who refrain form itemizing their respective tax deductions. This also includes the granting of $7,500 to new buyers. It allots to the state $10 billion for floating mortgage revenue bonds to help in the refinancing of sub-prime mortgages. Thirdly the bill made changes in the Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae mortgage companies that are federally sponsored.
Democrats together with a large Republican approval supported the bill but the numbers were not strong enough to override the veto threat. The critics said that it was a bail out for buyers by putting the market at jeopardy. Republican Rep. John Kline criticized the bill for doing ‘little to address the current foreclosure problems’. The market should be allowed to find its level. However he did not oppose other forms of assistance. Walz stressed on voluntary moves between lenders and borrowers. He did not want the blame game to sling mud at each other. His contention was that since the forest is already on fire something should be immediately done before arguing about who started it. The problem should be tackled keeping in view the interests of the borrowers, the mortgage industry as well as the market.
