Linden Lumber Skips Foreclosure By Repaying Debt
Monday, September 10th, 2007Marengo based Linden Lumber business concern has been able to avoid the crisis of foreclosure by arranging for and repaying a debt of $5 million. This was stated by Federal Land Bank last Friday. The representative of the bank said that a new settlement has been arrived at regarding repayment of the $5 million dues. Linden Lumber, founded in 1955 is one of the largest companies in Marengo employing a large number of people. It operates one of the key industries. Of late the company has been financially stumbling. 150 employees were laid off and two prime sections closed down about three years ago.
Upon this negotiation depended the fate of 425 jobholders in an economically backward region. As per previous schedule foreclosure sale was to be held on Friday. The bank was reluctant to divulge the details of the confidential agreement. The company’s agents and spokespersons could not be contacted for their remarks and comments.
The agreement follows an approval issued by the Marengo County Commission on 24th August 2007 that allowed public funds to the tune of $5 million to $7 million to be used to save a sinking concern from drowning. The welfare and livelihood of many were tied to its fate and hence the concern and remedy. It is the first time that Marengo County has put into force its wide lending discretionary powers which Alabama Counties enjoy. This is as per an amendment made to the constitution of the state in 2006.
Woody Dining, the acting attorney of Marengo County said that it would take many weeks for the fund to be actually released; it might even be months. There were stipulations and strings attached regarding the meeting of certain requirements by the company. However the very fact that funds have been sanctioned meant that Linden Lumber had sufficient negotiating power to enforce a satisfactory agreement.
Although there had been unanimous voting in the meeting on 24th August in favour of bailing out Linden Lumber nevertheless the whole episode was not without criticism. There were many who disliked the idea of using public funds to help a private company. Most spoke in favour taking into account the broader perspectives but a vociferous minority opposed the move saying that the policy was bad and would set up a questionable precedent that would not bode well for the future.